This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62009CN0144
Case C-144/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 24 April 2009 — Hotel Alpenhof GesmbH v Oliver Heller
Case C-144/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 24 April 2009 — Hotel Alpenhof GesmbH v Oliver Heller
Case C-144/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 24 April 2009 — Hotel Alpenhof GesmbH v Oliver Heller
SL C 153, 4.7.2009, p. 26–26
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 24/04/2009
- Date lodged:
- 24/04/2009
- Author:
- Sud
- Form:
- Pravosudna informacija
- Authentic language:
- njemački
- Type of procedure:
- Prethodno pitanje
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- request for interpretation 32001R0044 članak 15.1 PT C)
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
4.7.2009 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 153/26 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 24 April 2009 — Hotel Alpenhof GesmbH v Oliver Heller
(Case C-144/09)
2009/C 153/47
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Oberster Gerichtshof
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Hotel Alpenhof GesmbH
Claimant: Oliver Heller
Question referred
Is the fact that a website of the party with whom a consumer has concluded a contract can be consulted on the internet sufficient to justify a finding that an activity is being ‘directed’, within the terms of Article 15(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 (‘the Brussels I Regulation’)? (1)
(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters; OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1.
