Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62020CN0228

    Case C-228/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Niedersächsisches Finanzgericht (Germany) lodged on 2 June 2020 — I GmbH v Finanzamt H

    IO C 271, 17.8.2020, p. 26–26 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    17.8.2020   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 271/26


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Niedersächsisches Finanzgericht (Germany) lodged on 2 June 2020 — I GmbH v Finanzamt H

    (Case C-228/20)

    (2020/C 271/34)

    Language of the case: German

    Referring court

    Niedersächsisches Finanzgericht

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: I GmbH

    Defendant: Finanzamt H

    Questions referred

    1.

    Is Paragraph 4, point 14(b), of the Umsatzsteuergesetz (Law on Turnover Tax) (UStG) compatible with Article 132(1)(b) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (‘the VAT Directive’), (1) in so far as hospitals which are not bodies governed by public law qualify for exemption from tax on condition that they are approved within the meaning of Paragraph 108 of the Sozialgesetzbuch (SGB) V (Social Security Code, Book V)?

    2.

    If Question 1 is to be answered in the negative: When do hospitals governed by private law provide hospital care under social conditions comparable with those applicable to bodies governed by public law within the meaning of Article 132(1)(b) of the VAT Directive?


    (1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.


    Top