Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62018TA0505

    Case T-505/18: Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2020 — Hungary v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Support for rural development — Support granted to producer groups — Expenditure incurred by Hungary — Article 35 of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 — Qualified recognition — Eligibility of the beneficiary of the aid — Calculated financial correction — Article 52(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 — Sincere cooperation — Protection of legitimate expectations — Proportionality — Legal certainty — Ineligible amounts)

    IO C 95, 23.3.2020, p. 25–25 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    23.3.2020   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 95/25


    Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2020 — Hungary v Commission

    (Case T-505/18) (1)

    (EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Support for rural development - Support granted to producer groups - Expenditure incurred by Hungary - Article 35 of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 - Qualified recognition - Eligibility of the beneficiary of the aid - Calculated financial correction - Article 52(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 - Sincere cooperation - Protection of legitimate expectations - Proportionality - Legal certainty - Ineligible amounts)

    (2020/C 95/30)

    Language of the case: Hungarian

    Parties

    Applicant: Hungary (represented by: M. Fehér, M. Tátrai, A. Pokoraczki and G. Koós, acting as Agents)

    Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka and J. Aquilina, acting as Agents)

    Re:

    Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking partial annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/873 of 13 June 2018 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2018 L 152, p. 29).

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Hungary to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 399, 5.11.2018.


    Top