This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018CA0591
Case C-591/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 November 2019 — Brugg Kabel AG, Kabelwerke Brugg AG Holding v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for underground and submarine power cables — Market allocation in connection with projects — Fines — Rights of the defence — Access to the file — Principle of the presumption of innocence — Distortion of the evidence)
Case C-591/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 November 2019 — Brugg Kabel AG, Kabelwerke Brugg AG Holding v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for underground and submarine power cables — Market allocation in connection with projects — Fines — Rights of the defence — Access to the file — Principle of the presumption of innocence — Distortion of the evidence)
Case C-591/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 November 2019 — Brugg Kabel AG, Kabelwerke Brugg AG Holding v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for underground and submarine power cables — Market allocation in connection with projects — Fines — Rights of the defence — Access to the file — Principle of the presumption of innocence — Distortion of the evidence)
IO C 36, 3.2.2020, p. 11–11
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
3.2.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 36/11 |
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 November 2019 — Brugg Kabel AG, Kabelwerke Brugg AG Holding v European Commission
(Case C-591/18 P) (1)
(Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European market for underground and submarine power cables - Market allocation in connection with projects - Fines - Rights of the defence - Access to the file - Principle of the presumption of innocence - Distortion of the evidence)
(2020/C 36/13)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Appellants: Brugg Kabel AG, Kabelwerke Brugg AG Holding (represented by: A. Rinne, M. Lichtenegger and S. Schricker, Rechtsanwälte)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: H. Leupold, H. van Vliet and C. Vollrath, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the appeal; |
2. |
Brugg Kabel AG and Kabelwerke Brugg AG Holding to pay the costs. |