This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TN0687
Case T-687/17: Action brought on 5 October 2017 — Vendrell Marti v SRB
Case T-687/17: Action brought on 5 October 2017 — Vendrell Marti v SRB
Case T-687/17: Action brought on 5 October 2017 — Vendrell Marti v SRB
IO C 5, 8.1.2018, p. 46–46
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
8.1.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 5/46 |
Action brought on 5 October 2017 — Vendrell Marti v SRB
(Case T-687/17)
(2018/C 005/62)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Pedro Vendrell Marti (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: E. Martínez Martínez and C. López-Mélida de Ramón, lawyers)
Defendant: Single Resolution Board
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
|
— |
Annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB/EES/2017/08) and the independent expert’s valuation on which it is based in accordance with Article 20(15) of Regulation No 806/2014; |
|
— |
Declare Articles 18 and 29 of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 illegal and inapplicable; |
|
— |
Order the Single Resolution Board to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.