EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TN0412
Case T-412/16: Action brought on 31 July 2016 — Bena Properties v Council
Case T-412/16: Action brought on 31 July 2016 — Bena Properties v Council
Case T-412/16: Action brought on 31 July 2016 — Bena Properties v Council
IO C 364, 3.10.2016, p. 19–19
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
3.10.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 364/19 |
Action brought on 31 July 2016 — Bena Properties v Council
(Case T-412/16)
(2016/C 364/16)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Bena Properties Co. SA (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
declare the applicant’s application admissible and well-founded; |
|
— |
as a consequence, annul Decision (CFSP) 2016/850 of 27 May 2016 and the subsequent measures implementing it, in so far as they relate to the applicant; |
|
— |
order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of its action, the applicant raises five pleas in law which are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-411/16, Syriatel Mobile Telecom v Council.