This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011TB0149
Case T-149/11: Order of the General Court of 12 October 2011 — GS v Parliament and Council (Action for annulment — Regulation (EU) No 1210/2010 — Right of the Member States to refuse the reimbursement of euro coins unfit for circulation — No direct concern — Inadmissible)
Case T-149/11: Order of the General Court of 12 October 2011 — GS v Parliament and Council (Action for annulment — Regulation (EU) No 1210/2010 — Right of the Member States to refuse the reimbursement of euro coins unfit for circulation — No direct concern — Inadmissible)
Case T-149/11: Order of the General Court of 12 October 2011 — GS v Parliament and Council (Action for annulment — Regulation (EU) No 1210/2010 — Right of the Member States to refuse the reimbursement of euro coins unfit for circulation — No direct concern — Inadmissible)
IO C 347, 26.11.2011, p. 32–32
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
26.11.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 347/32 |
Order of the General Court of 12 October 2011 — GS v Parliament and Council
(Case T-149/11) (1)
(Action for annulment - Regulation (EU) No 1210/2010 - Right of the Member States to refuse the reimbursement of euro coins unfit for circulation - No direct concern - Inadmissible)
2011/C 347/55
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: GS Gesellschaft für Umwelt- und Energie-Serviceleistungen mbH (Eigeltingen, Germany) (represented by: J. Schmidt, lawyer)
Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: U. Rësslein and A. Neergaard, Agents) and Council of the European Union (represented by: J. Monteiro and M. Simm, Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the second sentence of Article 8(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1210/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2010 concerning authentication of euro coins and handling of euro coins unfit for circulation (OJ 2010 L 339, p. 1)
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
|
2. |
GS Gesellschaft für Umwelt- und Energie-Serviceleistungen mbH shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Parliament and by the Council of the European Union. |
|
3. |
There is no need to adjudicate on the Kingdom of Spain’s application for leave to intervene. |