Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62020TN0201

    Case T-201/20: Action brought on 6 April 2020 — Berebene v EUIPO — Consorzio vino Chianti Classico (GHISU)

    IO C 191, 8.6.2020, p. 38–38 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    06/04/2020
    Date lodged:
    06/04/2020
    Author:
    Cúirt Ghinearálta
    Form:
    Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
    Authentic language:
    Iodáilis
    Type of procedure:
    Caingean le haghaidh neamhniú
    Defendant:
    Oifig Maoine Intleachtúla an Aontais Eorpaigh

    8.6.2020   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 191/38

    Action brought on 6 April 2020 — Berebene v EUIPO — Consorzio vino Chianti Classico (GHISU)

    (Case T-201/20)

    (2020/C 191/51)

    Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

    Parties

    Applicant: Berebene Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: A. Massimiani, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Consorzio vino Chianti Classico (Radda in Chianti, Italy)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the Court

    Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark in colour GHISU — Application for registration No 17 232 571

    Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

    Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 January 2020 in Case R 592/2019-1

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the contested decision;

    —

    and, as a result, order the registration of EU figurative mark GHISU No 17 232 571 also for the goods in Class 33 of the Nice Agreement;

    —

    order EUIPO to pay the costs of the opposition and appeal proceedings.

    Plea in law

    —

    Incorrect comparison of the marks at issue and incorrect global assessment of the likelihood of confusion and unfair advantage.
    Top