Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62018TA0377

    Case T-377/18: Judgment of the General Court of 28 June 2019 — Intercept Pharma and Intercept Pharmaceuticals v EMA (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents held by EMA containing information submitted by the applicants in the context of the marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Ocaliva — Decision to grant a third party access to a document — Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings)

    IO C 288, 26.8.2019, p. 51–51 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    26.8.2019   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 288/51


    Judgment of the General Court of 28 June 2019 — Intercept Pharma and Intercept Pharmaceuticals v EMA

    (Case T-377/18) (1)

    (Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents held by EMA containing information submitted by the applicants in the context of the marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Ocaliva - Decision to grant a third party access to a document - Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings)

    (2019/C 288/64)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicants: Intercept Pharma Ltd (Bristol, United Kingdom) and Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (New York, New York, United States), (represented by: L. Tsang, J. Mulryne, E. Amos and H. Kerr-Peterson, Solicitors, and F. Campbell, Barrister)

    Defendant: European Medicines Agency (represented by: initially by S. Marino, S. Drosos, A. Rusanov and T. Jabłoński, and subsequently by S. Marino, S. Drosos, T. Jabłoński, R. Pita and G. Gavriilidou, Agents)

    Re:

    Action under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of EMA decision ASK-40399 of 15 May 2018, granting to a third party, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43), access to a document containing information submitted in the context of an application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Ocaliva.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Intercept Pharma Ltd and Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 311, 3.9.2018.


    Top