Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62017TA0391

Case T-391/17: Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2019 — Romania v Commission (Law governing the institutions — European citizens’ initiative — Protection of national and linguistic minorities — Strengthening of cultural and linguistic diversity — Registration in part — Principle of conferral — Commission not manifestly lacking legislative powers — Obligation to state reasons — Article 5(2) TEU — Article 4(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 — Article 296 TFEU)

IO C 413, 9.12.2019, p. 43–43 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

9.12.2019   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 413/43


Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2019 — Romania v Commission

(Case T-391/17) (1)

(Law governing the institutions - European citizens’ initiative - Protection of national and linguistic minorities - Strengthening of cultural and linguistic diversity - Registration in part - Principle of conferral - Commission not manifestly lacking legislative powers - Obligation to state reasons - Article 5(2) TEU - Article 4(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 - Article 296 TFEU)

(2019/C 413/50)

Language of the case: Romanian

Parties

Applicant: Romania (represented initially by: R. Radu, C.-M. Florescu, E. Gane and L. Lițu, and subsequently by Florescu, Gane, Lițu and C.-R. Canțăr, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. Krämer, L. Radu Bouyon and H. Stancu, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Hungary (represented by: M. Fehér, G. Koós and G. Tornyai, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/652 of 29 March 2017 on the proposed citizens’ initiative entitled ‘Minority SafePack — one million signatures for diversity in Europe’ (OJ 2017 L 92, p. 100).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders Romania to pay its own costs and those incurred by the Commission, including those relating to the interim proceedings;

3.

Orders Hungary to bear its own costs.


(1)  OJ C 269, 14.8.2017.


Top