Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62013FB0074

Case F-74/13: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 2 August 2016 –Mommer v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Pensions — Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations — Transfer to the EU pension scheme of pension rights acquired under other schemes — Decision recognising years of pensionable service applying the new GIPs relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations — Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure — Action manifestly unfounded)

IO C 364, 3.10.2016, p. 45–46 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

3.10.2016   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 364/45


Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 2 August 2016 –Mommer v Commission

(Case F-74/13) (1)

((Civil Service - Officials - Pensions - Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Transfer to the EU pension scheme of pension rights acquired under other schemes - Decision recognising years of pensionable service applying the new GIPs relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure - Action manifestly unfounded))

(2016/C 364/57)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Anne Mommer (Brussels, Belgium) (represented initially by: S. Orlandi, J.-N. Louis and D. de Abreu Caldas, lawyers, and subsequently by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: C. Ehrbar and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents, and subsequently by: J. Currall and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents, and finally by: G. Gattinara, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision concerning the transfer of the applicant’s pension rights to the European Union pension scheme, which decision applies the new GIPs relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of Officials.

Operative part of the order

1.

The action is dismissed as in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs.


(1)  OJ C 274, 21.9.2013, p. 33.


Top