This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010TA0477
Case T-477/10: Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2011 SE — Blusen Stenau v OHIM (Sport Eybl & Sports Experts (SE© SPORTS EQUIPMENT) (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Application for Community figurative mark SE© SPORTS EQUIPMENT — Prior national word mark SE So Easy — Relative grounds for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009)
Case T-477/10: Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2011 SE — Blusen Stenau v OHIM (Sport Eybl & Sports Experts (SE© SPORTS EQUIPMENT) (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Application for Community figurative mark SE© SPORTS EQUIPMENT — Prior national word mark SE So Easy — Relative grounds for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009)
Case T-477/10: Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2011 SE — Blusen Stenau v OHIM (Sport Eybl & Sports Experts (SE© SPORTS EQUIPMENT) (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Application for Community figurative mark SE© SPORTS EQUIPMENT — Prior national word mark SE So Easy — Relative grounds for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009)
OJ C 25, 28.1.2012, p. 49–50
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
28.1.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 25/49 |
Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2011 SE — Blusen Stenau v OHIM (Sport Eybl & Sports Experts (SE© SPORTS EQUIPMENT)
(Case T-477/10) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for Community figurative mark SE© SPORTS EQUIPMENT - Prior national word mark SE So Easy - Relative grounds for refusal - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009)
(2012/C 25/95)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: SE — Blusen Stenau GmbH (Gronau, Germany) (represented by: O. Bischof, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Pohlmann, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Sport Eybl & Sports Experts GmbH (Wels, Austria) (represented by: M. Pachinger and S. Fürst., lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 July 2010 (Case R 139372009-1) concerning an opposition procedure between SE — Blusen Stenau GmbH and Sport Eybl & Sports Experts GmbH.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 22 July 2010 (Case R 139372009-1); |
|
2. |
Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by SE — Blusen Stenau GmbH; |
|
3. |
Orders Sport Eybl & Sports Experts GmbH to bear its own costs. |