This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62008TA0107
Case T-107/08: Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2011 — Transnational Company ‘Kazchrome’ and ENRC Marketing v Council and Commission (Dumping — Imports of silico-manganese originating in China and Kazakhstan — Action for annulment — Export price — Comparison between export price and normal value — Calculation of the undercutting margin — Non-contractual liability)
Case T-107/08: Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2011 — Transnational Company ‘Kazchrome’ and ENRC Marketing v Council and Commission (Dumping — Imports of silico-manganese originating in China and Kazakhstan — Action for annulment — Export price — Comparison between export price and normal value — Calculation of the undercutting margin — Non-contractual liability)
Case T-107/08: Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2011 — Transnational Company ‘Kazchrome’ and ENRC Marketing v Council and Commission (Dumping — Imports of silico-manganese originating in China and Kazakhstan — Action for annulment — Export price — Comparison between export price and normal value — Calculation of the undercutting margin — Non-contractual liability)
OJ C 25, 28.1.2012, p. 48–48
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
28.1.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 25/48 |
Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2011 — Transnational Company ‘Kazchrome’ and ENRC Marketing v Council and Commission
(Case T-107/08) (1)
(Dumping - Imports of silico-manganese originating in China and Kazakhstan - Action for annulment - Export price - Comparison between export price and normal value - Calculation of the undercutting margin - Non-contractual liability)
(2012/C 25/91)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: Transnational Company ‘Kazchrome’ AO (Aktobe, Kazakhstan); and ENRC Marketing AG (Kloten, Switzerland) (represented initially by L. Ruessmann and A. Willems, and subsequently by A. Willems and S. De Knop, lawyers)
Defendants: Council of the European Union (represented initially by J.-P. Hix, acting as Agent, and G. Berrisch and G. Wolf, lawyers, and subsequently by J.-P. Hix and B. Driessen, acting as Agents, and G. Berrisch, lawyer); and European Commission (represented by: H. van Vliet and K. Talabér-Ritz, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendants: Euroalliages (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J. Bourgeois, Y. van Gerven and N. McNelis, lawyers)
Re:
Application, first, for annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 1420/2007 of 4 December 2007 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of silico-manganese originating in the People’s Republic of China and Kazakhstan and terminating the proceeding on imports of silico-manganese originating in Ukraine (OJ 2007 L 317, p. 5), in so far as it concerns imports of silico-manganese produced by Transnational Company ‘Kazchrome’ AO, and, second, for damages.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Annuls Article 1 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1420/2007 of 4 December 2007 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of silico-manganese originating in the People’s Republic of China and Kazakhstan and terminating the proceeding on imports of silico-manganese originating in Ukraine in so far as that article applies to imports of silico-manganese produced by Transnational Company ‘Kazchrome’ AO; |
|
2. |
Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
|
3. |
Orders Transnational Company ‘Kazchrome’ and ENRC Marketing AG to bear half of their own costs and to bear the costs of the European Commission; |
|
4. |
Orders the Council of the European Union to bear half of the costs of Transnational Company ‘Kazchrome’ and ENRC Marketing, in addition to its own costs; |
|
5. |
Orders Euroalliages to bear its own costs. |