This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TN0087R(01)
Corrigendum to notice in the Official Journal in Case T-87/21 (OJ C 110, 29.3.2021)
Corrigendum to notice in the Official Journal in Case T-87/21 (OJ C 110, 29.3.2021)
Corrigendum to notice in the Official Journal in Case T-87/21 (OJ C 110, 29.3.2021)
OJ C 182, 10.5.2021, p. 68–68
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
10.5.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 182/68 |
Corrigendum to notice in the Official Journal in Case T-87/21
( Official Journal of the European Union C 110 of 29 March 2021 )
(2021/C 182/92)
On page 37, Case T-87/21, Condor Flugdienst v Commission should read as follows:
‘Action brought on 12 February 2021 — Condor Flugdienst v Commission
(Case T-87/21)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Condor Flugdienst GmbH (Kelsterbach, Germany) (represented by: A. Israel, J. Lang and M. Negro, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the defendant’s decision of 25 June 2020 on State aid SA.57153 (2020/N) — Germany — COVID-19: Aid to Lufthansa (1), and |
|
— |
order the defendant to pay the applicant’s costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
|
1. |
First plea in law, alleging that the defendant infringed its obligation to initiate the formal investigation procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU. |
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging that the defendant committed a manifest error of assessment by holding that the aid to Lufthansa is compatible with the internal market under Article 107(3)(b) TFEU. |
|
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging that the defendant failed to fulfil its duty to state reasons.’ |