Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62021CN0761

    Case C-761/21 P: Appeal brought on 10 December 2021 by St. Hippolyt Holding GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 20 October 2021 in Case T-351/20, St. Hippolyt v EUIPO — Raisioaqua

    OJ C 237, 20.6.2022, p. 23–23 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    20.6.2022   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 237/23

    Appeal brought on 10 December 2021 by St. Hippolyt Holding GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 20 October 2021 in Case T-351/20, St. Hippolyt v EUIPO — Raisioaqua

    (Case C-761/21 P)

    (2022/C 237/29)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Appellant: St. Hippolyt Holding GmbH (represented by: M. Gail, Rechtsanwalt)

    Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Raisioaqua Oy

    By order of 31 March 2022, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that St. Hippolyt Holding GmbH should bear its own costs.

    Top