This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019CA0899
Case C-899/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 January 2022 — Romania v European Commission, Hungary (Appeal — Law governing the institutions — Citizens’ initiative — Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 — Article 4(2)(b) — Registration of a proposed citizens’ initiative — Condition requiring that that proposed citizens’ initiative does not manifestly fall outside the framework of the European Commission’s powers to submit a proposal for a legal act for the purpose of implementing the Treaties — Decision (EU) 2017/652 — Citizens’ initiative ‘Minority SafePack — one million signatures for diversity in Europe’ — Registration in part — Article 5(2) TEU — Principle of conferral — Article 296 TFEU — Obligation to state reasons — Audi alteram partem rule)
Case C-899/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 January 2022 — Romania v European Commission, Hungary (Appeal — Law governing the institutions — Citizens’ initiative — Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 — Article 4(2)(b) — Registration of a proposed citizens’ initiative — Condition requiring that that proposed citizens’ initiative does not manifestly fall outside the framework of the European Commission’s powers to submit a proposal for a legal act for the purpose of implementing the Treaties — Decision (EU) 2017/652 — Citizens’ initiative ‘Minority SafePack — one million signatures for diversity in Europe’ — Registration in part — Article 5(2) TEU — Principle of conferral — Article 296 TFEU — Obligation to state reasons — Audi alteram partem rule)
Case C-899/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 January 2022 — Romania v European Commission, Hungary (Appeal — Law governing the institutions — Citizens’ initiative — Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 — Article 4(2)(b) — Registration of a proposed citizens’ initiative — Condition requiring that that proposed citizens’ initiative does not manifestly fall outside the framework of the European Commission’s powers to submit a proposal for a legal act for the purpose of implementing the Treaties — Decision (EU) 2017/652 — Citizens’ initiative ‘Minority SafePack — one million signatures for diversity in Europe’ — Registration in part — Article 5(2) TEU — Principle of conferral — Article 296 TFEU — Obligation to state reasons — Audi alteram partem rule)
OJ C 119, 14.3.2022, p. 5–5
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
OJ C 119, 14.3.2022, p. 3–3
(GA)
|
14.3.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 119/5 |
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 January 2022 — Romania v European Commission, Hungary
(Case C-899/19 P) (1)
(Appeal - Law governing the institutions - Citizens’ initiative - Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 - Article 4(2)(b) - Registration of a proposed citizens’ initiative - Condition requiring that that proposed citizens’ initiative does not manifestly fall outside the framework of the European Commission’s powers to submit a proposal for a legal act for the purpose of implementing the Treaties - Decision (EU) 2017/652 - Citizens’ initiative ‘Minority SafePack — one million signatures for diversity in Europe’ - Registration in part - Article 5(2) TEU - Principle of conferral - Article 296 TFEU - Obligation to state reasons - Audi alteram partem rule)
(2022/C 119/06)
Language of the case: Romanian
Parties
Appellant: Romania (represented by: E. Gane, L. Liţu, M. Chicu and L. E. Baţagoi, acting as Agents)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: initially by I. Martínez del Peral, H. Stancu and H. Krämer, subsequently by I. Martínez del Peral and H. Stancu, acting as Agents, Hungary (represented by: M. Z. Fehér and K. Szíjjártó, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the appeal; |
|
2. |
Orders Romania to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
|
3. |
Orders Hungary to bear its own costs. |