EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019CA0114
Case C-114/19 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 June 2020 — European Commission v Danilo Di Bernardo (Appeal — Civil service — Open competition — Non-admission to tests — Possible for the administration to supplement before the Court the statement of reasons for the decision not to admit — Conditions — Exceptional cases — Concept of ‘absence of a statement of reasons’)
Case C-114/19 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 June 2020 — European Commission v Danilo Di Bernardo (Appeal — Civil service — Open competition — Non-admission to tests — Possible for the administration to supplement before the Court the statement of reasons for the decision not to admit — Conditions — Exceptional cases — Concept of ‘absence of a statement of reasons’)
Case C-114/19 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 June 2020 — European Commission v Danilo Di Bernardo (Appeal — Civil service — Open competition — Non-admission to tests — Possible for the administration to supplement before the Court the statement of reasons for the decision not to admit — Conditions — Exceptional cases — Concept of ‘absence of a statement of reasons’)
OJ C 329, 5.10.2020, p. 2–2
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
5.10.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 329/2 |
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 June 2020 — European Commission v Danilo Di Bernardo
(Case C-114/19 P) (1)
(Appeal - Civil service - Open competition - Non-admission to tests - Possible for the administration to supplement before the Court the statement of reasons for the decision not to admit - Conditions - Exceptional cases - Concept of ‘absence of a statement of reasons’)
(2020/C 329/02)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: European Commission (represented by: B. Mongin and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings: Danilo Di Bernardo (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the appeal; |
|
2. |
Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |