This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TA0255
Case T-255/18: Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2019 — US v ECB (Civil service — ECB staff — Fixed-term contract — Contract for an indefinite period — Refusal to reclassify a fixed term contract as a contract for an indefinite period — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment)
Case T-255/18: Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2019 — US v ECB (Civil service — ECB staff — Fixed-term contract — Contract for an indefinite period — Refusal to reclassify a fixed term contract as a contract for an indefinite period — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment)
Case T-255/18: Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2019 — US v ECB (Civil service — ECB staff — Fixed-term contract — Contract for an indefinite period — Refusal to reclassify a fixed term contract as a contract for an indefinite period — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment)
OJ C 413, 9.12.2019, p. 48–48
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
9.12.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 413/48 |
Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2019 — US v ECB
(Case T-255/18) (1)
(Civil service - ECB staff - Fixed-term contract - Contract for an indefinite period - Refusal to reclassify a fixed term contract as a contract for an indefinite period - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment)
(2019/C 413/57)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: US (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)
Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: F. von Lindeiner and M. Rötting, Agents, and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
Re:
Application based on Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and seeking, first, annulment of the ECB’s decision not to reclassify the applicant’s contract as a contract for an indefinite period and, secondly, compensation in respect of the harm which the applicant allegedly suffered as a result of that decision.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders US to pay the costs. |