Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62014TN0222

    Case T-222/14: Action brought on 10 April 2014 — Deluxe Laboratories v OHIM (deluxe)

    OJ C 175, 10.6.2014, p. 51–52 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    10.6.2014   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 175/51

    Action brought on 10 April 2014 — Deluxe Laboratories v OHIM (deluxe)

    (Case T-222/14)

    2014/C 175/70

    Language of the case: Spanish

    Parties

    Applicant: Deluxe Laboratories, Inc (Burbank, United States) (represented by: S. Serrat Viñas, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 22 January 2014 in Case R 1250/2013-2;

    —

    order the defendant to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark with word element ‘deluxe’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 35, 37, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 45 — Community trade mark application No 11 253 044

    Decision of the Examiner: Registration refused

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

    Pleas in law:

    —

    Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009;

    —

    Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;

    —

    Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

    —

    Infringement of Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009;

    —

    Infringement of the principles of then protection of legitimate expectations, acquired rights and the lawfulness of Community measures
    Top