This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013TA0514
Case T-514/13: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2015 — AgriCapital v OHIM — agri.capital (AGRI.CAPITAL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark AGRI.CAPITAL — Earlier Community word marks AgriCapital and AGRICAPITAL — Relative ground for refusal — No similarity between the services — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-514/13: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2015 — AgriCapital v OHIM — agri.capital (AGRI.CAPITAL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark AGRI.CAPITAL — Earlier Community word marks AgriCapital and AGRICAPITAL — Relative ground for refusal — No similarity between the services — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-514/13: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2015 — AgriCapital v OHIM — agri.capital (AGRI.CAPITAL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark AGRI.CAPITAL — Earlier Community word marks AgriCapital and AGRICAPITAL — Relative ground for refusal — No similarity between the services — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
OJ C 236, 20.7.2015, p. 36–36
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
20.7.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 236/36 |
Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2015 — AgriCapital v OHIM — agri.capital (AGRI.CAPITAL)
(Case T-514/13) (1)
((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark AGRI.CAPITAL - Earlier Community word marks AgriCapital and AGRICAPITAL - Relative ground for refusal - No similarity between the services - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 236/47)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: AgriCapital Corp. (New York, United States) (represented by: P. Meyer and M. Gramsch, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: agri.capital GmbH (Münster, Germany) (represented by: A. Nordemann-Schiffel, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 July 2013 (Case R 2236/2012-2), relating to opposition proceedings between AgriCapital Corp. and agri.capital GmbH.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders AgriCapital Corp. to pay the costs. |