This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013CB0448
Case C-448/13 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 June 2014 — Delphi Technologies, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Appeals — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 7(1)(b) — Word mark INNOVATION FOR THE REAL WORLD — Advertising slogan — Refusal of registration — No distinctive character)
Case C-448/13 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 June 2014 — Delphi Technologies, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Appeals — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 7(1)(b) — Word mark INNOVATION FOR THE REAL WORLD — Advertising slogan — Refusal of registration — No distinctive character)
Case C-448/13 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 June 2014 — Delphi Technologies, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Appeals — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 7(1)(b) — Word mark INNOVATION FOR THE REAL WORLD — Advertising slogan — Refusal of registration — No distinctive character)
OJ C 261, 11.8.2014, p. 9–10
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
11.8.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 261/9 |
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 June 2014 — Delphi Technologies, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
(Case C-448/13 P) (1)
((Appeals - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 7(1)(b) - Word mark INNOVATION FOR THE REAL WORLD - Advertising slogan - Refusal of registration - No distinctive character))
2014/C 261/15
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Delphi Technologies, Inc. (represented by: C. Albrecht and J. Heumann, Rechtsanwälte)
Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)
Operative part of the order
|
1) |
The appeal is dismissed. |
|
2) |
Delphi Technologies, Inc. shall pay the costs. |