EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011TN0618
Case T-618/11 P: Appeal brought on 6 December 2011 by Carlo De Nicola against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 28 September 2011 in Case F-13/10, De Nicola v EIB
Case T-618/11 P: Appeal brought on 6 December 2011 by Carlo De Nicola against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 28 September 2011 in Case F-13/10, De Nicola v EIB
Case T-618/11 P: Appeal brought on 6 December 2011 by Carlo De Nicola against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 28 September 2011 in Case F-13/10, De Nicola v EIB
OJ C 25, 28.1.2012, p. 65–66
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
28.1.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 25/65 |
Appeal brought on 6 December 2011 by Carlo De Nicola against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 28 September 2011 in Case F-13/10, De Nicola v EIB
(Case T-618/11 P)
(2012/C 25/125)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Appellant: Carlo De Nicola (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by L. Isola, lawyer)
Other party to the proceedings: European Investment Bank
Form of order sought by the appellant
The appellant claims that the Court should:
— |
annul: |
— |
the measure of 23 September 2009 by which the Appeals Committee rejected the appellant’s complaint against the staff report for 2008, and all related measures; |
— |
the entire staff report for 2008; |
— |
the promotions decided upon on 18 March 2009; |
— |
all related, consequent and prior measures, including the guidelines laid down by the HR Directorate (in the proceedings at first instance, the appellant adjusted his claim, requesting that the guidelines be disapplied); |
— |
order the EIB to pay compensation for the consequent material and non-material damage, to pay the costs of the proceedings, together with interest and a sum in respect of monetary depreciation; |
— |
order the EIB to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
The present appeal is brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (CST) of 28 September 2011 dismissing the appellant’s action seeking: (i) annulment of the decision of 23 September 2009 adopted by the Appeals Committee of the European Investment Bank; (ii) annulment of the appellant’s staff report for 2008; (iii) annulment of the promotion decisions of 18 March 2009; (iv) annulment of the decision refusing promotion; and (v) an order that the EIB pay compensation for the material and non-material damage which the appellant claims to have suffered.
The appellant relies on the following grounds of appeal:
A. |
The claims seeking annulment
|
B. |
The claim for damages
|