This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010TB0413
Case T-413/10 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 13 April 2011 — Socitrel v Commission (Application for interim measures — Competition — Commission decision imposing a fine — Bank guarantee — Application for suspension of operation — Pecuniary damage — No exceptional circumstances — No urgency)
Case T-413/10 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 13 April 2011 — Socitrel v Commission (Application for interim measures — Competition — Commission decision imposing a fine — Bank guarantee — Application for suspension of operation — Pecuniary damage — No exceptional circumstances — No urgency)
Case T-413/10 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 13 April 2011 — Socitrel v Commission (Application for interim measures — Competition — Commission decision imposing a fine — Bank guarantee — Application for suspension of operation — Pecuniary damage — No exceptional circumstances — No urgency)
OJ C 179, 18.6.2011, p. 16–16
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
18.6.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 179/16 |
Order of the President of the General Court of 13 April 2011 — Socitrel v Commission
(Case T-413/10 R)
(Application for interim measures - Competition - Commission decision imposing a fine - Bank guarantee - Application for suspension of operation - Pecuniary damage - No exceptional circumstances - No urgency)
2011/C 179/28
Language of the case: Portuguese
Parties
Applicant: Socitrel — Sociedade Industrial de Trefilaria, SA (Trofa, Portugal) (represented by: F. Proença de Carvalho and T. Luísa de Faria, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre, V. Bottka and P. Costa de Oliveira, Agents, and M. Marques Mendes, lawyer)
Re:
Application for suspension of the operation of Commission Decision C(2010) 4387 final of 30 June 2010 relating to a procedure pursuant to Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.344 — Prestressed steel) and for waiver of the obligation to establish a bank guarantee in order to prevent the immediate recovery of the fine imposed under Article 2 of that decision.
Operative part of the order
The Court hereby orders:
1. |
The application for interim measures is dismissed; |
2. |
The costs are reserved. |