Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62006TA0204

    Case T-204/06: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 June 2009 — Vivartia v OHIM — Kraft Foods Schweiz (milko ΔΕΛΤΑ) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark milko ΔΕΛΤΑ — Earlier Community figurative mark MILKA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

    OJ C 180, 1.8.2009, p. 44–44 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    1.8.2009   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 180/44


    Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 June 2009 — Vivartia v OHIM — Kraft Foods Schweiz (milko ΔΕΛΤΑ)

    (Case T-204/06) (1)

    (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark milko ΔΕΛΤΑ - Earlier Community figurative mark MILKA - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

    2009/C 180/80

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Vivartia ABEE Proïonton Diatrofis kai Ypiresion Estiasis, formerly Delta Protypos Viomichania Galaktos AE (Tavros, Greece) (represented by: P.-P. Kanellopoulos and V. Kanellopoulos, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Kraft Foods Schweiz Holding AG (Zurich, Switzerland) (represented by: T. de Haan and P. Péters, lawyers)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 June 2006 (Case R 540/2005-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Kraft Foods Schweiz Holding AG and Delta Protypos Viomichania Galaktos AE.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Vivartia ABEE Proïonton Diatrofis kai Ypiresion Estiasis to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 224, 16.9.2006.


    Top