EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017CA0082
Case C-82/17 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 September 2019 — TestBioTech eV, European Network of Scientists for Social and Environmental Responsibility eV, Sambucus eV v European Commission, Monsanto Europe, Monsanto Company, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (Appeal – Environment – Genetically modified products – Commission decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing genetically modified soybean MON 87701 x MON 89788 – Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Article 10(1) – Request for internal review of the decision, submitted under the provisions relating to public participation in environmental decision-making – Rejection of the request)
Case C-82/17 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 September 2019 — TestBioTech eV, European Network of Scientists for Social and Environmental Responsibility eV, Sambucus eV v European Commission, Monsanto Europe, Monsanto Company, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (Appeal – Environment – Genetically modified products – Commission decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing genetically modified soybean MON 87701 x MON 89788 – Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Article 10(1) – Request for internal review of the decision, submitted under the provisions relating to public participation in environmental decision-making – Rejection of the request)
Case C-82/17 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 September 2019 — TestBioTech eV, European Network of Scientists for Social and Environmental Responsibility eV, Sambucus eV v European Commission, Monsanto Europe, Monsanto Company, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (Appeal – Environment – Genetically modified products – Commission decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing genetically modified soybean MON 87701 x MON 89788 – Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Article 10(1) – Request for internal review of the decision, submitted under the provisions relating to public participation in environmental decision-making – Rejection of the request)
OJ C 383, 11.11.2019, p. 6–6
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
11.11.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 383/6 |
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 September 2019 — TestBioTech eV, European Network of Scientists for Social and Environmental Responsibility eV, Sambucus eV v European Commission, Monsanto Europe, Monsanto Company, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
(Case C-82/17 P) (1)
(Appeal - Environment - Genetically modified products - Commission decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing genetically modified soybean MON 87701 x MON 89788 - Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 - Article 10(1) - Request for internal review of the decision, submitted under the provisions relating to public participation in environmental decision-making - Rejection of the request)
(2019/C 383/04)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellants: TestBioTech eV, European Network of Scientists for Social and Environmental Responsibility eV, Sambucus eV (represented by: K. Smith QC and J. Stevenson, Barrister)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, G. Gattinara and C. Valero, Agents), Monsanto Europe, Monsanto Company (represented initially by M. Pittie, and subsequently by P. Honoré and A. Helfer, avocats), United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the appeal; |
|
2. |
Orders TestBioTech eV, European Network of Scientists for Social and Environmental Responsibility eV and Sambucus eV to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
|
3. |
Orders Monsanto Europe and Monsanto Company to bear their own costs. |