Válassza ki azokat a kísérleti funkciókat, amelyeket ki szeretne próbálni

Ez a dokumentum az EUR-Lex webhelyről származik.

Dokumentum 62021CA0628

    Case C-628/21, Castorama Polska and Knor: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 April 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie — Poland) — TB (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual property — Directive 2004/48/EC — Measures, procedures and remedies necessary to ensure the enforcement of intellectual property rights — Right of information — Locus standi — Need to establish the existence of an intellectual property right in advance)

    OJ C 216, 19.6.2023., 13—14. o. (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    19.6.2023   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 216/13


    Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 April 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie — Poland) — TB

    (Case C-628/21, (1) Castorama Polska and Knor)

    (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Intellectual property - Directive 2004/48/EC - Measures, procedures and remedies necessary to ensure the enforcement of intellectual property rights - Right of information - Locus standi - Need to establish the existence of an intellectual property right in advance)

    (2023/C 216/17)

    Language of the case: Polish

    Referring court

    Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: TB

    Other parties to the proceedings: Castorama Polska sp. z o.o., ‘Knor’ sp. z o.o.

    Operative part of the judgment

    Article 8(1) of Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights

    must be interpreted as meaning that, in proceedings concerning an infringement of an intellectual property right under that provision, the applicant must, for the purpose of a request for information under Article 8, provide any reasonably available evidence enabling the court seised of that request to satisfy itself with a sufficient degree of certainty that the applicant is the rightholder, by submitting evidence appropriate to the nature of that right and any special applicable formalities.


    (1)  OJ C 95, 28.2.2022.


    Az oldal tetejére