EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TA0760
Case T-760/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2019 — Meesenburg Großhandel v EUIPO (Triotherm+) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark Triotherm+ — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Right to be heard)
Case T-760/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2019 — Meesenburg Großhandel v EUIPO (Triotherm+) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark Triotherm+ — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Right to be heard)
Case T-760/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2019 — Meesenburg Großhandel v EUIPO (Triotherm+) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark Triotherm+ — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Right to be heard)
OJ C 155, 6.5.2019, p. 41–41
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 20/03/2019
- Date lodged:
- 20/11/2017
- Author:
- General Court
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- German
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment - unfounded
- Defendant:
- European Union Intellectual Property Office
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62017TJ0760
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
|
6.5.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 155/41 |
Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2019 — Meesenburg Großhandel v EUIPO (Triotherm+)
(Case T-760/17) (1)
(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark Triotherm+ - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Right to be heard)
(2019/C 155/48)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Meesenburg Großhandel KG (Flensburg, Germany) (represented by: D. Freiherr von Oldershausen, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 September 2017 (Case R 1786/2016-1), concerning an application for registration of the word sign Triotherm+ as an EU trade mark.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action. |
|
2. |
Orders Meesenburg Großhandel KG to pay the costs. |
