Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62016TA0688

Case T-688/16: Judgment of the General Court of 22 November 2018 — Janssen-Cases v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Recruitment — Vacancy notice — Commission Mediator — Competent appointing authority — Delegation of powers — Procedure — Consultation of the Staff Committee — Liability)

OJ C 44, 4.2.2019, p. 24–25 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

4.2.2019   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/24


Judgment of the General Court of 22 November 2018 — Janssen-Cases v Commission

(Case T-688/16) (1)

((Civil Service - Officials - Recruitment - Vacancy notice - Commission Mediator - Competent appointing authority - Delegation of powers - Procedure - Consultation of the Staff Committee - Liability))

(2019/C 44/30)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Mercedes Janssen-Cases (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: initially, J.-N. Louis and N. de Montigny, and, subsequently, J.-N. Louis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Berscheid, and, subsequently, G. Berscheid and L. Radu Bouyon, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the Commission decision of 15 June 2016 appointing W as the Commission Mediator and the note of 16 June 2016 by which the Commission informed the applicant of the result of the selection procedure and, secondly, compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 15 June 2016 appointing W as the Commission Mediator and the note of 16 June 2016 by which the Commission informed Ms Mercedes Janssen-Cases of the result of the selection procedure for that post;

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

3.

Orders the Commission to pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim relief.


(1)  OJ C 410, 7.11.2016.


Top