EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62023CN0189
Case C-189/23, Consorzio Nazionale Servizi: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 23 March 2023 — Consorzio Nazionale Servizi Società Cooperativa (CNS) v Consip SpA
Case C-189/23, Consorzio Nazionale Servizi: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 23 March 2023 — Consorzio Nazionale Servizi Società Cooperativa (CNS) v Consip SpA
Case C-189/23, Consorzio Nazionale Servizi: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 23 March 2023 — Consorzio Nazionale Servizi Società Cooperativa (CNS) v Consip SpA
OJ C 216, 19.6.2023, p. 26–26
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
19.6.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 216/26 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 23 March 2023 — Consorzio Nazionale Servizi Società Cooperativa (CNS) v Consip SpA
(Case C-189/23, Consorzio Nazionale Servizi)
(2023/C 216/35)
Language of the case: Italian
Referring court
Consiglio di Stato
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Consorzio Nazionale Servizi Società Cooperativa (CNS)
Respondent: Consip SpA
Question referred
Do Articles 16, 49, 50 and 52 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Article 4 of Protocol No 7 to the European Convention on Human Rights, Article 6 TEU, and the principles of proportionality, competition, freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services laid down in Articles 49, 50, 54 and 56 TFEU preclude national rules (Articles 38(1)(f), 48 and 75 of decreto legislativo n. 163 (Legislative Decree No 163) of 2006) which provide for the application of the penalty of forfeiture of the provisional security, as an automatic consequence of the exclusion of an economic operator from a procedure for the award of a public service contract, even though that economic operator has already been the addressee, in relation to the same single conduct, of another penalty determined following a specific procedure initiated by another competent authority of the same Member State?