EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022CA0099
Case C-99/22, Kapniki A. Michailidis: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 May 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias — Greece) — Kapniki A. Michailidis AE v Organismos Pliromon kai Elenchou Koinotikon Enischiseon Prosanatolismou kai Engyiseon (OPEKEPE) and Ypourgos Agrotikis Anaptyxis kai Trofimon (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Agriculture — Regulation (EEC) No 2062/92 — Article 3(3) — Validity — Common organisation of the markets — Raw tobacco — Premiums granted to purchasers of leaf tobacco — Reduction of those premiums according to the quantity of tobacco of low class, category or quality purchased — Principles of non-retroactivity and of the protection of legitimate expectations)
Case C-99/22, Kapniki A. Michailidis: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 May 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias — Greece) — Kapniki A. Michailidis AE v Organismos Pliromon kai Elenchou Koinotikon Enischiseon Prosanatolismou kai Engyiseon (OPEKEPE) and Ypourgos Agrotikis Anaptyxis kai Trofimon (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Agriculture — Regulation (EEC) No 2062/92 — Article 3(3) — Validity — Common organisation of the markets — Raw tobacco — Premiums granted to purchasers of leaf tobacco — Reduction of those premiums according to the quantity of tobacco of low class, category or quality purchased — Principles of non-retroactivity and of the protection of legitimate expectations)
Case C-99/22, Kapniki A. Michailidis: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 May 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias — Greece) — Kapniki A. Michailidis AE v Organismos Pliromon kai Elenchou Koinotikon Enischiseon Prosanatolismou kai Engyiseon (OPEKEPE) and Ypourgos Agrotikis Anaptyxis kai Trofimon (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Agriculture — Regulation (EEC) No 2062/92 — Article 3(3) — Validity — Common organisation of the markets — Raw tobacco — Premiums granted to purchasers of leaf tobacco — Reduction of those premiums according to the quantity of tobacco of low class, category or quality purchased — Principles of non-retroactivity and of the protection of legitimate expectations)
OJ C 216, 19.6.2023, p. 20–20
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
19.6.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 216/20 |
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 May 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias — Greece) — Kapniki A. Michailidis AE v Organismos Pliromon kai Elenchou Koinotikon Enischiseon Prosanatolismou kai Engyiseon (OPEKEPE) and Ypourgos Agrotikis Anaptyxis kai Trofimon
(Case C-99/22, (1) Kapniki A. Michailidis)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Agriculture - Regulation (EEC) No 2062/92 - Article 3(3) - Validity - Common organisation of the markets - Raw tobacco - Premiums granted to purchasers of leaf tobacco - Reduction of those premiums according to the quantity of tobacco of low class, category or quality purchased - Principles of non-retroactivity and of the protection of legitimate expectations)
(2023/C 216/26)
Language of the case: Greek
Referring court
Symvoulio tis Epikrateias
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Kapniki A. Michailidis AE
Respondents: Organismos Pliromon kai Elenchou Koinotikon Enischiseon Prosanatolismou kai Engyiseon (OPEKEPE) and Ypourgos Agrotikis Anaptyxis kai Trofimon
Operative part of the judgment
Consideration of the question referred has disclosed no factor of such a kind as to affect the validity of Article 3(3) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2062/92 of 30 June 1992 fixing, for the 1992 harvest, the norm and intervention prices and the premiums granted to purchasers of leaf tobacco, the derived intervention prices for baled tobacco, the reference qualities, and the production areas, in the light of the principles of non-retroactivity of rules of law and of the protection of legitimate expectations.