Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62013TA0045

Case T-45/13: Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2015 — Rose Vision and Seseña v Commission (Arbitration clause — Seventh Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007-2013) — Grant agreements relating to the FIRST, FutureNEM and sISI projects — Actions for annulment and compensation — Reclassification of the actions — Admissibility — Suspension of payments — Deadline for providing the audit report — Dissemination of information to third parties)

OJ C 127, 20.4.2015, p. 22–22 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

20.4.2015   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/22


Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2015 — Rose Vision and Seseña v Commission

(Case T-45/13) (1)

((Arbitration clause - Seventh Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007-2013) - Grant agreements relating to the FIRST, FutureNEM and sISI projects - Actions for annulment and compensation - Reclassification of the actions - Admissibility - Suspension of payments - Deadline for providing the audit report - Dissemination of information to third parties))

(2015/C 127/29)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicants: Rose Vision, SL (Seseña, Spain); and Julián Seseña (Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain) (represented by: M. Muñiz Bernuy and A. Alonso Villa, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and A. Sauka, acting as Agents, assisted by J. Rivas Andrés and X. M. García García, lawyers)

Re:

First, action for annulment of the Commission’s letter by which it suspended the payments under grant agreement No 246910, relating to the FutureNEM project, and of financial audit report 11-INFS-025, on the basis of which it adopted that measure, and, secondly, action for damages for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicants as a consequence of the Commission’s conduct, up to a maximum of EUR 5 8 54  264, without prejudice to the damages which may be assessed in the course of the present proceedings as well as interest accrued.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders Rose Vision, SL and Mr Julián Seseña to pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 178, 22.6.2013.


Top