Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62012CN0395

    Case C-395/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel (Luxembourg) lodged on 27 August 2012 — État du Grand-duché de Luxembourg, Administration de l’enregistrement et des domaines v Edenred Luxembourg SA

    OJ C 366, 24.11.2012, p. 24–24 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    24.11.2012   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 366/24


    Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel (Luxembourg) lodged on 27 August 2012 — État du Grand-duché de Luxembourg, Administration de l’enregistrement et des domaines v Edenred Luxembourg SA

    (Case C-395/12)

    2012/C 366/42

    Language of the case: French

    Referring court

    Cour d’appel

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicants: État du Grand-duché de Luxembourg, Administration de l’enregistrement et des domaines

    Defendant: Edenred Luxembourg SA

    Question referred

    Are services carried out by an organisation issuing luncheon vouchers in Luxembourg for a restaurateur who is a member of its acceptance network exempt, either in full or in part, from VAT pursuant to Article 13B(d)(3) of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC (1) of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended, if a luncheon voucher is not a fully-fledged financial security and those services are not intended to guarantee payment for a meal purchased by an employee of the business customer (ibid. Article 13B(d)(2)), in the case of luncheon vouchers allocated by an employer to its employees under the State legislation …, given that membership of a luncheon vouchers network allows a member to profit from the custom of employees of the business customers of the luncheon voucher operator and that that operator is paying the processing costs for those luncheon vouchers?


    (1)  OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1.


    Top