This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011TA0366
Case T-366/11: Judgment of the General Court of 9 October 2012 — Bial-Portela v OHIM — Isdin (ZEBEXIR) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark ZEBEXIR — Earlier Community word mark ZEBINIX — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-366/11: Judgment of the General Court of 9 October 2012 — Bial-Portela v OHIM — Isdin (ZEBEXIR) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark ZEBEXIR — Earlier Community word mark ZEBINIX — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-366/11: Judgment of the General Court of 9 October 2012 — Bial-Portela v OHIM — Isdin (ZEBEXIR) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark ZEBEXIR — Earlier Community word mark ZEBINIX — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
OJ C 366, 24.11.2012, p. 33–33
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
24.11.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 366/33 |
Judgment of the General Court of 9 October 2012 — Bial-Portela v OHIM — Isdin (ZEBEXIR)
(Case T-366/11) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark ZEBEXIR - Earlier Community word mark ZEBINIX - Relative grounds for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2012/C 366/64
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Bial-Portela & C a , SA (São Mamede do Coronado, Portugal) (represented by: B. Braga da Cruz and J.M. Conceição Pimenta, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Isdin, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: P. López Ronda, G. Macias Bonilla, G. Marín Raigal and H.L. Curtis-Oliver, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 April 2011 (Case R 1212/2009-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Bial-Portela & Ca, SA and Isdin, SA
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 6 April 2011 (Case R 1212/2009-1); |
|
2. |
Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those of Bial-Portela & Ca, SA; |
|
3. |
Orders Isdin, SA to bear its own costs. |