Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62011CN0617

    Case C-617/11 P: Appeal brought on 1 December 2011 by Luigi Marcuccio against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 14 September 2011 in Case T-236/02 Marcuccio v Commission

    OJ C 25, 28.1.2012, p. 43–43 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    28.1.2012   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 25/43


    Appeal brought on 1 December 2011 by Luigi Marcuccio against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 14 September 2011 in Case T-236/02 Marcuccio v Commission

    (Case C-617/11 P)

    (2012/C 25/81)

    Language of the case: Italian

    Parties

    Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

    Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

    Form of order sought

    Set aside the judgment of 14 September 2011 in Case T-236/02 in so far as it rejected the claims seeking compensation and reparation made by the appellant in his written submissions at first instance;

    Order the Commission to pay the costs and allow in their entirety and without any exception whatsoever the claims seeking compensation and reparation;

    In the alternative, refer the case back in part to the General Court for a fresh decision on the claims seeking compensation and reparation.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Errors of procedure so serious as to damage irreparably the interests of the appellant;

    total failure to state grounds, as well irrational, tautological, illogical and inconsistent reasoning, and misinterpretation and misapplication of Annex X to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, of the rules on the interpretation of laws and of the conditions governing the liability of a European Union institution for payment of compensation for damage;

    confused and arbitrary reasoning and distortion and misrepresentation of the facts;

    distortion and misrepresentation of the facts and misinterpretation and misapplication of the rules on the admissibility of documents instituting proceedings.


    Top