Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62020TN0462

    Case T-462/20: Action brought on 16 July 2020 — ZU v Commission

    OJ C 329, 5.10.2020, p. 16–17 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    5.10.2020   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 329/16

    Action brought on 16 July 2020 — ZU v Commission

    (Case T-462/20)

    (2020/C 329/34)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: ZU (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Commission

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the decisions of the Appointing Authority of 5 September 2019, denying information relevant for his defence, and of 6 April 2020, rejecting his complaint;

    —

    order the defendant to pay an amount of EUR 50 000, in compensation for the non-material damage suffered, together with interest at the legal rate until payment in full has been made; and

    —

    order the defendant to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

    1.

    First plea in law, alleging violation of the applicant’s right of defence and his right to effective remedy.

    2.

    Second plea in law, alleging that the Appointing Authority made a manifest error in assessing the subject matter of the complaint, omitting a key plea and showing a disregard for the likelihood of/change in the applicant’s legal situation.
    Top