This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TN0067
Case T-67/20: Action brought on 3 February 2020 — Hauz 1929 v EUIPO — Houzz (HAUZ NEW YORK)
Case T-67/20: Action brought on 3 February 2020 — Hauz 1929 v EUIPO — Houzz (HAUZ NEW YORK)
Case T-67/20: Action brought on 3 February 2020 — Hauz 1929 v EUIPO — Houzz (HAUZ NEW YORK)
OJ C 95, 23.3.2020, p. 44–44
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
23.3.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 95/44 |
Action brought on 3 February 2020 — Hauz 1929 v EUIPO — Houzz (HAUZ NEW YORK)
(Case T-67/20)
(2020/C 95/53)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Hauz 1929 Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: N. Lyberis, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Houzz, Inc. (Palo Alto, California, United States)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark HAUZ NEW YORK — Application for registration No 17 593 807
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 November 2019 in Case R 886/2019-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
partially annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order EUIPO and other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the applicant in the present proceedings, including those incurred before EUIPO. |
Plea in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |