Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62017CN0066

    Case C-66/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy Poznań-Grunwald i Jeżyce w Poznaniu (Poland) lodged on 7 February 2017 — Grzegorz Chudaś and Irena Chudaś v DA Deutsche Allgemeine Versicherung Aktiengesellschaft AG

    OJ C 161, 22.5.2017, p. 8–8 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    22.5.2017   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 161/8


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy Poznań-Grunwald i Jeżyce w Poznaniu (Poland) lodged on 7 February 2017 — Grzegorz Chudaś and Irena Chudaś v DA Deutsche Allgemeine Versicherung Aktiengesellschaft AG

    (Case C-66/17)

    (2017/C 161/10)

    Language of the case: Polish

    Referring court

    Sąd Rejonowy Poznań-Grunwald i Jeżyce w Poznaniu

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicants: Grzegorz Chudaś and Irena Chudaś

    Defendant: DA Deutsche Allgemeine Versicherung Aktiengesellschaft AG

    Question referred

    Should Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 creating a European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims (1) … (‘Regulation No 805/2004’), read in conjunction with Article 7 of that regulation, be interpreted as meaning that a European Enforcement Order certificate may be issued in respect of a decision concerning reimbursement of the costs of proceedings contained in a judgment in which a court has established the existence of a right?


    (1)  OJ 2004 L 143, p. 15.


    Top