This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014TN0416
Case T-416/14: Action brought on 12 June 2014 — Grup Maritim TCB v Commission
Case T-416/14: Action brought on 12 June 2014 — Grup Maritim TCB v Commission
Case T-416/14: Action brought on 12 June 2014 — Grup Maritim TCB v Commission
         OJ C 253, 4.8.2014, p. 55–55
		 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
         
      
| 
                4.8.2014  | 
            
                EN  | 
            
                Official Journal of the European Union  | 
            
                C 253/55  | 
         
Action brought on 12 June 2014 — Grup Maritim TCB v Commission
(Case T-416/14)
2014/C 253/72
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Grup Maritim TCB, SL (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: A. López Gómez, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
| 
                —  | 
            
                annul the contested decision;  | 
         
| 
                —  | 
            
                in the alternative, annul the decision categorising the measures which together constitute the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’ (‘STLS’) as new State aid that is incompatible with the internal market;  | 
         
| 
                —  | 
            
                in the alternative, annul Articles 1 and 4 of the contested decision, which identify the investors in the Economic Interest Groupings (EIGs) as the only beneficiaries of the alleged aid and, consequently, as solely liable for its recovery;  | 
         
| 
                —  | 
            
                in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it orders recovery of the alleged aid in breach of general principles of EU law;  | 
         
| 
                —  | 
            
                in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it makes a determination as to the lawfulness of private contracts between the investors and other entities, in full or in such a way as to limit the bar on passing on the burden of recovery to the profitability of the operations; and  | 
         
| 
                —  | 
            
                order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings.  | 
         
Pleas in law and main arguments
The pleas in law and main arguments are those raised in Case T-401/14 Duro Felguera SA v Commission.