This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62008TB0126
Case T-126/08: Order of the Court of First Instance of 10 February 2009 — Okalux v OHIM — Ondex (ONDACELL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Failure to pay the opposition fee — Decision deeming the opposition non-existent — Action manifestly devoid of any legal basis)
Case T-126/08: Order of the Court of First Instance of 10 February 2009 — Okalux v OHIM — Ondex (ONDACELL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Failure to pay the opposition fee — Decision deeming the opposition non-existent — Action manifestly devoid of any legal basis)
Case T-126/08: Order of the Court of First Instance of 10 February 2009 — Okalux v OHIM — Ondex (ONDACELL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Failure to pay the opposition fee — Decision deeming the opposition non-existent — Action manifestly devoid of any legal basis)
OJ C 82, 4.4.2009, p. 24–24
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
4.4.2009 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 82/24 |
Order of the Court of First Instance of 10 February 2009 — Okalux v OHIM — Ondex (ONDACELL)
(Case T-126/08) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Failure to pay the opposition fee - Decision deeming the opposition non-existent - Action manifestly devoid of any legal basis)
(2009/C 82/43)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Okalux GmbH (Marktheidenfeld, Germany) (represented by: M. Beckensträter, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Ondex SAS (Chevigny-Saint-Sauveur, France)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 January 2008 (Case R 1384/2007-4) regarding opposition proceedings between Okalux GmbH and Ondex SAS.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed. |
|
2. |
Okalux GmbH is ordered to pay the costs. |