Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62019CN0912

    Case C-912/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 13 December 2019 — Agrimotion S.A. v ADAMA Deutschland GmbH

    OJ C 95, 23.3.2020, p. 15–15 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    23.3.2020   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 95/15


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 13 December 2019 — Agrimotion S.A. v ADAMA Deutschland GmbH

    (Case C-912/19)

    (2020/C 95/16)

    Language of the case: German

    Referring court

    Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Defendant and appellant: Agrimotion S.A.

    Applicant and respondent: ADAMA Deutschland GmbH

    Question referred

    Can an undertaking which places a plant protection product authorised in the Member State of origin on the market of the Member State of introduction rely on the parallel trade permit granted by the competent authority of the Member State of introduction to a third undertaking, if the canisters containing the plant protection product and in which that product is placed on the market of the Member State of introduction indicate both the holder of the permit and the importing undertaking? If there are any additional requirements, what are they? (1)


    (1)  Pursuant to Article 52 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC (OJ 2009 L 309, p. 1).


    Top