EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TN0398
Case T-398/20: Action brought on 26 June 2020 — Riviera-Airport v EUIPO — Aéroports de la Côte d’Azur (RIVIERA AIRPORT)
Case T-398/20: Action brought on 26 June 2020 — Riviera-Airport v EUIPO — Aéroports de la Côte d’Azur (RIVIERA AIRPORT)
Case T-398/20: Action brought on 26 June 2020 — Riviera-Airport v EUIPO — Aéroports de la Côte d’Azur (RIVIERA AIRPORT)
OJ C 271, 17.8.2020, p. 47–48
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
17.8.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 271/47 |
Action brought on 26 June 2020 — Riviera-Airport v EUIPO — Aéroports de la Côte d’Azur (RIVIERA AIRPORT)
(Case T-398/20)
(2020/C 271/60)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Aeroporto di Villanova d’Albenga SpA (Riviera-Airport) (Villanova d’Albenga, Italy) (represented by: G. Casucci, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Aéroports de la Côte d’Azur (Nice, France)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark RIVIERA AIRPORT in colour — European Union trade mark No 16 392 731
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 April 2020 in Case R 2174/2019-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
annul the contested decision; |
— |
alter the contested decision to: |
— |
allow the applicant’s appeal,
|
— |
order the payment of the applicant’s fees and costs. |
Pleas in law
— |
Failure to interpret the correct ruling of bad faith application; |
— |
Wrong and partial analysis and evaluation of the relevant indicia required in the overall and case-by-case assessment of the bad faith application; |
— |
Failure to consider all the other relevant indicia and the available evidence of the bad faith according to the required overall and case-by-case assessment of the bad faith application; |
— |
Wrong interpretation and enforcement of Article 12(2) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 to the case at issue; |
— |
Failure of the Board of Appeal to carry out a correct analysis. |