This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019CN0741
Case C-741/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Paris (France) lodged on 8 October 2019 — Republic of Moldova v Komstroy, a company the successor in law to the company Energoalians
Case C-741/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Paris (France) lodged on 8 October 2019 — Republic of Moldova v Komstroy, a company the successor in law to the company Energoalians
Case C-741/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Paris (France) lodged on 8 October 2019 — Republic of Moldova v Komstroy, a company the successor in law to the company Energoalians
OJ C 413, 9.12.2019, p. 34–35
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 08/10/2019
- Date lodged:
- 08/10/2019
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- French
- Type of procedure:
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Submits a preliminary question about 21994A1231(52) article 1 paragraph 6
- Submits a preliminary question about 21994A1231(52) article 26 paragraph 1
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
9.12.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 413/34 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Paris (France) lodged on 8 October 2019 — Republic of Moldova v Komstroy, a company the successor in law to the company Energoalians
(Case C-741/19)
(2019/C 413/41)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Cour d’appel de Paris
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Republic of Moldova
Respondent: Komstroy, a company the successor in law to the company Energoalians
Questions referred
|
— |
Must Article 1.6 of the Energy Charter Treaty be interpreted as meaning that a claim which arose from a contract for the sale of electricity and which did not involve any contribution on the part of the investor in the host State can constitute an ‘investment’ within the meaning of that article? |
|
— |
Must Article 26(1) of the Energy Charter Treaty be interpreted as meaning that the acquisition, by an investor of a Contracting Party, of a claim established by an economic operator which is not from one of the States that are Parties to that Treaty constitutes an investment? |
|
— |
Must Article 26(1) of the Energy Charter Treaty be interpreted as meaning that a claim held by an investor, which arose from a contract for the sale of electricity supplied at the border of the host State, can constitute an investment made in the area of another Contracting Party, in the case where the investor does not carry out any economic activity in the territory of that latter Contracting Party? |
