Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62019CN0737

Case C-737/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal administratrif de Montreuil (France) lodged on 7 October 2019 — Bank of China Limited v Ministre de l’Action and des Comptes publics

OJ C 413, 9.12.2019, p. 33–33 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

Date of document:
07/10/2019
Date lodged:
07/10/2019
Author:
Court of Justice
Form:
Judicial information
Authentic language:
French
Type of procedure:
Reference for a preliminary ruling
Link
Select all documents mentioning this document
Case affecting:
  • Submits a preliminary question about 32006L0112 article 169 point (a)
  • Submits a preliminary question about 32006L0112 article 169 point (c)
  • Submits a preliminary question about 62017CJ0165
Link

9.12.2019   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 413/33

Request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal administratrif de Montreuil (France) lodged on 7 October 2019 — Bank of China Limited v Ministre de l’Action and des Comptes publics

(Case C-737/19)

(2019/C 413/39)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal administratrif de Montreuil

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Bank of China Limited

Defendant: Ministre de l’Action and des Comptes publics

Questions referred

1.

Are the solutions adopted in the judgment of 24 January 2019, Morgan Stanley & Co International plc v Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances (C-165/17) applicable where a branch, on the one hand, carries out, in a Member State, transactions subject to VAT, and, on the other, supplies services for the benefit of its principal establishment and branches established in a third country?

2.

Where a branch established in a Member State claims a right to deduct based on the expenditure incurred by it in connection with the supply of services for the benefit of its principal establishment in a third-country, that is exports of financial and banking services, may the taxable person deduct value added tax pursuant to Article 169(a) or Article 169(c) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ L 347, p. 1)?

3.

If the first question is answered in the affirmative and the branch may claim a deduction pursuant to Article 169(a), under what conditions may banking transactions carried out by the principal establishment established in a third country be regarded as giving rise to a right to deduct if they had been carried out in the Member State the expenditure subject to value added tax is incurred? If the first question is answered in the affirmative and the branch may claim a deduction pursuant to Article 169(c), under what conditions may the recipient of the services be regarded as being established outside the European Union where the branch is located in the European Union and forms part of one and the same legal entity as its principal establishment?
Top