Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62019CN0367

Case C-367/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Državna revizijska komisija za revizijo postopkov oddaje javnih naročil (Slovenia) lodged on 8 May 2019 — Ministrstvo za notranje zadeve v Tax-Fin-Lex d. o. o.

OJ C 263, 5.8.2019, p. 32–32 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

Date of document:
08/05/2019
Date lodged:
08/05/2019
Author:
Court of Justice
Form:
Judicial information
Authentic language:
Slovenian
Type of procedure:
Reference for a preliminary ruling
Link
Select all documents mentioning this document
Case affecting:
  • Submits a preliminary question about 32014L0024 article 2 paragraph 1 point 5
Link

5.8.2019   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/32

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Državna revizijska komisija za revizijo postopkov oddaje javnih naročil (Slovenia) lodged on 8 May 2019 — Ministrstvo za notranje zadeve v Tax-Fin-Lex d. o. o.

(Case C-367/19)

(2019/C 263/37)

Language of the case: Slovenian

Referring court

Državna revizijska komisija za revizijo postopkov oddaje javnih naročil

Parties to the main proceedings

Contracting authority: Ministrstvo za notranje zadeve

Applicant for review: Tax-Fin-Lex d. o. o.

Questions referred

1.

Is there a ‘contract for pecuniary interest’ as part of a public contract within the meaning of Article 2(1)(5) of Directive 2014/24, (1) where the contracting authority is not required to provide any consideration but, by performing the public contract, the economic operator obtains access to a new market and references?

2.

Is it possible or necessary to interpret Article 2(1)(5) of Directive 2014/24 in such a way that it constitutes a basis for rejecting a bid with a price of EUR 0.00?

(1)  Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65).

Top