Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62016TN0412

    Case T-412/16: Action brought on 31 July 2016 — Bena Properties v Council

    OJ C 364, 3.10.2016, p. 19–19 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    31/07/2016
    Date lodged:
    31/07/2016
    Author:
    General Court
    Form:
    Judicial information
    Authentic language:
    French
    Type of procedure:
    Action for annulment
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Case affecting:
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    3.10.2016   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 364/19

    Action brought on 31 July 2016 — Bena Properties v Council

    (Case T-412/16)

    (2016/C 364/16)

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: Bena Properties Co. SA (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat, lawyer)

    Defendant: Council of the European Union

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    declare the applicant’s application admissible and well-founded;

    —

    as a consequence, annul Decision (CFSP) 2016/850 of 27 May 2016 and the subsequent measures implementing it, in so far as they relate to the applicant;

    —

    order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    In support of its action, the applicant raises five pleas in law which are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-411/16, Syriatel Mobile Telecom v Council.

    Top