Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62014TN0477

    Case T-477/14: Action brought on 26 June 2014  — Caamaño Sistemas Metálicos and Others v Commission

    OJ C 261, 11.8.2014, p. 50–50 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    11.8.2014   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 261/50


    Action brought on 26 June 2014 — Caamaño Sistemas Metálicos and Others v Commission

    (Case T-477/14)

    2014/C 261/78

    Language of the case: Spanish

    Parties

    Applicants: Caamaño Sistemas Metálicos, SL (Coruña, Spain); Blumaq, SA (Castellón, Spain); Grupo Ibérica de Congelados, SA (Vigo, Spain); and Inversiones Rentaragon, SA (Zaragoza, Spain) (represented by: J.L. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, R. Calvo Salinero, and A. Lamadrid de Pablo, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Commission

    Form of order sought

    The applicants claim that the General Court should:

    annul the contested decision in so far as it categorises the measures which, according to that decision, together constitute the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’ as new State aid that is incompatible with the internal market;

    in the alternative, annul Articles 1 and 4 of the contested decision, which identify the investors in the Economic Interest Groupings (EIGs) as the beneficiaries of the alleged aid and as the sole addressees of the order for recovery;

    in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it orders recovery of the alleged aid;

    annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it makes a determination as to the lawfulness of private contracts between the investors and other entities; and

    order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    The pleas in law and main arguments are those raised in Case T-700/13 Bankia v Commission.


    Top