Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62013TN0522

    Case T-522/13: Action brought on 26 September 2013 — Tsujimoto v OHIM — Kenzo (KENZO ESTATE)

    OJ C 352, 30.11.2013, p. 20–20 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    26/09/2013
    Date lodged:
    26/09/2013
    Author:
    General Court
    Form:
    Judicial information
    Authentic language:
    English
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    30.11.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 352/20

    Action brought on 26 September 2013 — Tsujimoto v OHIM — Kenzo (KENZO ESTATE)

    (Case T-522/13)

    2013/C 352/38

    Language in which the application was lodged: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Kenzo Tsujimoto (Osaka, Japan) (represented by: A. Wenninger-Lenz, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Kenzo, SA (Paris, France)

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 3 July 2013 given in Case R 1363/2012-2;

    —

    Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

    Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘KENZO ESTATE’ for goods and services in Classes 29, 30, 31, 35, 41 and 43 — International Registration No W 1 016 724

    Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

    Mark or sign cited in opposition: The word mark ‘KENZO’ for goods in Classes 3, 18 and 25 — Community trade mark No 720 706

    Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: Upheld the appeal in part

    Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(5) CTMR.

    Top