Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 52013XX1224(01)

    Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position given at its meeting of 28 June 2013 regarding a draft decision relating to Case COMP/39.847/E-BOOKS — Rapporteur: Lithuania

    OJ C 378, 24.12.2013, p. 22–22 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    24/12/2013; Date of publication
    Author:
    Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions
    Form:
    Opinion

    24.12.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 378/22

    Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position given at its meeting of 28 June 2013 regarding a draft decision relating to Case COMP/39.847/E-BOOKS

    Rapporteur: Lithuania

    2013/C 378/12

    1.

    The Advisory Committee shares the competition concerns raised by the Commission in its draft decision.

    2.

    The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the behaviour may have effects on trade between Member States.

    3.

    The Advisory Committee agrees that the commitments offered by Penguin address the competition concerns raised by the Commission.

    4.

    The Advisory Committee agrees that the commitments are adequate.

    5.

    The Advisory Committee agrees with the duration of the commitments.

    6.

    The Advisory Committee agrees that the commitments should be made binding in full.

    7.

    The Advisory Committee agrees that in light of the commitments and without prejudice to Article 9(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 there are no longer grounds for action by the Commission against Penguin as regards the competition concerns identified in the draft decision.

    8.

    The Advisory Committee asks the Commission to take into account any other points raised during the discussion.

    9.

    The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.
    Top