Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62006CA0411

    Case C-411/06: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 September 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v European Parliament, Council of the European Union (Action for annulment — Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 — Shipments of waste — Choice of legal basis — Articles 133 EC and 175(1) EC)

    OJ C 267, 7.11.2009, p. 8–9 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    7.11.2009   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 267/8


    Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 September 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v European Parliament, Council of the European Union

    (Case C-411/06) (1)

    (Action for annulment - Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 - Shipments of waste - Choice of legal basis - Articles 133 EC and 175(1) EC)

    2009/C 267/14

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Valero Jordana, M. Huttunen and M. Konstantinidis, Agents)

    Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: I. Anagnostopoulou and U. Rösslein, Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Moore and K. Michoel, Agents)

    Interveners in support of the defendants: French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues, A. Adam and G. Le Bras, Agents), Republic of Austria (represented by: E. Riedl, Agent), United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: E. Jenkinson, E. O’Neil and S. Behzadi-Spencer, Agents, A. Dashwood, Barrister)

    Re:

    Annulment of Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 on shipments of waste (OJ 2006 L 190, p. 1) — Choice of legal basis — Act pursuing a dual purpose or having a dual component and requiring cumulative legal bases (Art. 175(1) EC and Art. 133 EC)

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs;

    3.

    Orders the French Republic, the Republic of Austria and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear their own costs.


    (1)  OJ C 294, 02.12.2006.


    Top