Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62009CA0522

    Case C-522/09: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 April 2011 — European Commission v Romania (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 79/409/EEC — Conservation of wild birds — Special protection areas — Areas designated insufficient in number and size — Irregularity of the pre-litigation procedure — Inadmissibility of the action)

    OJ C 179, 18.6.2011, p. 5–5 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    18.6.2011   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 179/5


    Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 April 2011 — European Commission v Romania

    (Case C-522/09) (1)

    (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 79/409/EEC - Conservation of wild birds - Special protection areas - Areas designated insufficient in number and size - Irregularity of the pre-litigation procedure - Inadmissibility of the action)

    2011/C 179/06

    Language of the case: Romanian

    Parties

    Applicant: European Commission (represented by: D. Recchia and L. Bouyon, acting as Agents)

    Defendant: Romania (represented by: A. Popescu, L.-E. Batagoi, M.-L. Colonescu, A.-R. Arșinel and J.S. Smaranda)

    Re:

    Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Article 4(1) and (2) of Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds (OJ 1979 L 103, p. 1) — Classification as special protection areas of areas insufficient in number and size, failing in part to have regard to the sites identified in the IBA Inventory — Alteration without scientific basis

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action as inadmissible;

    2.

    Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 51, 27.2.2010.


    Top